Re: FNC's Conductors may not necessarily be the same as NOT's DE1

Welcome to the McFaulds Lake HUB on AGORACOM

Discuss the various junior resource companies within the McFaulds Lake Area

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

cappysmart

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 9884 [?]

Votes: 298 Score: 3.2 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: FNC's Conductors may not necessarily be the same as NOT's DE1

in response to

FNC's Conductors may not necessarily be the same as NOT's DE1

johndefur

posted on Feb 28, 2008 09:03AM

With all due respect JD,you posted this on NOT forum several days ago:

The first striking point is that DE2 is a different type of deposit structure than DE1…DE2 is “Shear Hosted Deposit”..It is very similar to DE1 in Minerals and Sulfides content , except that DE@ contains in addition ,Chromite, both in layers and veins, as well as notable increases in Pyrrhotite , Magnetite and Large Crystals of Pentlandite, in addition to the regular sulfides found at DE1….

So you agree that DE2 has very similar "Minerals and Sulfides"content,2 kms. removed from DE1 but seem to doubt that this occurance of pentlandite and chalcopyrite would be present in an anomaly that is a mere 500 meters from DE1 and apparently connected.This opinion,you state,is based on the color(red) of the conductor anomaly.FYI, I see plenty of"red"zones on FNC's map.

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply