A bit confusing I know. I was comparing the stocks high for the year, before the find, and use that as the starting point. These were back of the envelope figures, accurate enoughtfor the point I hope*.

I felt this was a fair approach as it showed the highest value of the stock before NOT's discovery, and thus its speculative influence.

Your numbers are helpful as well.

BK

*In fact I see UC's high was higher then it is now - so she's actually in minus territory from her high before NOT's find!