I listened to about one half of the presentations this year, and I rely on the message board to fill in the information about the rest of the presentations.

I assumed you were speaking of Al when you mentioned the LOC, and I think he could cover part of the cash deficiencies; but not the whole enchalada (sp.).

As far as Matt's comments about partnership, I got the distinct impression that anything is possible with the right offer. I think the lawyers milk the heck out of every party when it comes to negotiations, and they will come to a compromise only when they see some other potential partner is about to move in for the kill (so to speak). And Matt will jump at the opportunity to partner up if the moment arrives. He has a vested interest to see this thing through one way or another. In other words, Matt's comments about a partnership haven't had that much impact on how I interpret what he thinks or doesn't think will occur first.

Am I making any sense, or not? I go with what seems the most logical scenario, and what my gut tells me.