Welcome To The Mannkind HUB On AGORACOM

Edit this title from the Fast Facts Section

Free
Message: Re: Management...

Aug 09, 2012 02:34PM

opc
Aug 09, 2012 04:15PM

Aug 09, 2012 05:31PM

Aug 09, 2012 05:43PM
1
opc
Aug 09, 2012 06:19PM
2
opc
Aug 09, 2012 06:20PM

Aug 10, 2012 08:54AM

Aug 11, 2012 02:46PM

opc
Aug 12, 2012 11:37AM

Aug 12, 2012 10:30PM
1
Aug 12, 2012 11:11PM

opc
Aug 13, 2012 01:34AM

opc
Aug 13, 2012 01:34AM

Aug 13, 2012 02:13AM
4
Aug 13, 2012 10:03AM

Aug 13, 2012 11:52AM
2
Aug 13, 2012 11:58AM

opc
Aug 13, 2012 10:40PM

Aug 14, 2012 12:10AM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 01:05AM

Aug 14, 2012 01:28AM

Aug 14, 2012 02:59AM

Aug 14, 2012 09:15AM

Aug 14, 2012 11:14AM

Aug 14, 2012 11:32AM
1
Aug 14, 2012 11:44AM

Aug 14, 2012 12:25PM
1
Aug 14, 2012 01:10PM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 02:21PM
1
opc
Aug 14, 2012 02:29PM
1
Aug 14, 2012 02:33PM

Aug 14, 2012 03:23PM

Aug 14, 2012 03:33PM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 04:46PM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 04:56PM
4
Aug 14, 2012 05:02PM

Aug 14, 2012 05:19PM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 05:29PM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 05:29PM
1
Aug 14, 2012 05:35PM

opc
Aug 14, 2012 06:04PM

Wow, indeed. I apologize for characterizing your scenario as preposterous. It was a poor choice of words. It sounds too personal and I meant nothing personal, as I'll assume you meant nothing personal by characterizing my thoughts as obtuse. After all, isn't that what this board is supposed to be about.

I suggested $10 - 50 million because it is a small enough amount to possibly fly under the radar of public scrutiny (assumming this unnamed country allows its citizens to scrutinize). I suggested on option because there is a precedent for this type of arrangement that may assist w/ FDA issues. Purchasing an option to secure a fixed cost for future delivery of goods is common. It would be a defensible transaction even under a worse case scenario.

You ask whether the 2 previous financings totaling in excess of $200million with zero collateral is acceptable - my answer is "yes". You also ask whether one loan for 200 million secured by 200 mil of insulin is preposterous? My revised answer is preposterous is a little strong. Highly unlikely is more in line. The primary difference between these two sources of funds is the mandate that governs the principles. The convertible debt buyers are professional investors who have probably hedged their position, but even if they haven't they are in the business of taking investment risk.

You ask several questions which I will answer to best of my ability:

So, assuming your negative scenario (AT LAST we agree on something "preposturous" :-) ) that we do not get approved, what does mgmt do? Fold up or look for foreign markets?

What management would do under this scenario depends on why they were rejected and what it would cost to fix. If it is an expensive fix, it would take some form of massive restructuring and recapitalization leaving current shareholders w/ a virtual total loss. Its not out of the question that the note holders for notes due in 12/2013 would force this action.

Probably preposturous to assume they'd first look to the country that offered 200mil PRE-APPROVAL.

I assume you are being facetious. But I'll agree to the extent that this would be a highly unlikely first course of action. Especially since if it were available they would already have done it (like now).

Trust me when I say, I hope you are right and they put this type of financing in place. I just don't consider it very likely. By the way, have you suggested this to Matt Pfeffer?

Regards.

2
opc
Aug 14, 2012 11:42PM

Aug 15, 2012 09:29AM
1
Aug 15, 2012 10:23AM
1
opc
Aug 15, 2012 10:49AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply