"In a way ISM and its posters have already answered my questions simply by not responding to legitimate questions put forward on the SH board. The questions are very basic and one the company itself should tell the answers to their shareholders.'

Nickel you are not the guy who invented negative billing are you? No means yes, yes means no, sort of thinking?

FYI, none of us that I know of, and myself included, are company spokespeople. I can't speak for ISM on their behalf and there are many posed questions which none of us may be able to answer and for that matter those who do try may not meet your needs.

But I would suggest bringing the "ISM questions" to the ISM hub and that way it's a bit more on-topic and possibly could be answered over there.

Putting words in people mouths simply because they had not or could not answer one of your questions is ridiculous. "His silence speaks volumes" sort of thing is not what good DD is made of. We will post in the affirmative if we have solid substantiated answers that can be backed up with links and or quotes. Otherwise it's all simply hearsay or opinions. Logical conclusions are the best we can do when it comes to guessing what is or isn't going to be the base for the upcoming 43-101. 276 drill holes and counting and they don't look to be in Cleaver or Douglas. Definitely not Jasper either.

For you I do suggest some caution though as I often think of one of Agora's posting rules whenever I read your posts. It goes like this:

5. BASHING OR HYPING - Unsubstantiated claims of grandeur or impending doom are best left to Nostradamus as they will cost you some valuable points towards your rating. Also included in this category is repetition of the same question, fact or opinion over and over after a response has been provided or if there is currently no ascertainable answer.