H, You are right on about Minefinders. Mark Bailey is a quality individual. Trustworthy, diligent and concerned about shareholder issues. Jim Puplava has been a supporter of Bailey and MFN for a long time and with good reason. He knows how to spot quality. I see Minefinders doing well over the next few years. So I wouldn't sweat too much. You are correct in your assessment that Jim Puplava is always on the lookout for candidates who will one day take over Kimber. Minefinders is going to be minting money in a few years and Kimber would be a good candidate for them. Believe me when I say Kimber is going to be able to prove up another two to three million ounces without going to a Canadian bank for one penny. I have 40 grand in Minefinders right now. Mark Bailey is the chief reason. He'll get the job done. But remember, his strength is not that he is a master promoter. It is that he is patient in a business where patience can be rare. He has waited and he is about to be rewarded richly in my view. I really am not a pompous ass. I'm actually a pretty nice guy, at least I think so. I'm just really busy, and a couple of guys from Tyhee have really been putting some negative stuff on this board. I'm tired of spending my time cleaning it up. Once again, as I've said before, I invite all discussion, but this is the Kimber Board. It should be related to Kimber and not of the nature: "Our company is better than yours! Don't you wish you were invested in our company?" I just don't see why on the Kimber Board I should spend my time explaining why I am not invested in Tyhee. My group has over 2.5 million dollars invested in Kimber, so we are not small time investors. Some of them write on this board. All of them read it, and they don't like being spoken to as if they are children or insulted. They are looking for thought provoking discussion, and I'm just trying to my best to create an environment that will provide that. I appreciate your input. Bull