"This is a simple item. If the court has made the ruling after its consideration of the factual evidence then it should spell out the reason for rejecting KWG bid to get back the shares with a 50% premium (reportedly this was the offer by KWG) over the pro-rated value of the shares in the total package."

In the initial ruling the Court determined that only the owner of the shares could sell the shares not the court and therefore declined KWG request. Now it's up to NOT. as owner of the shares as to their disposition. More than likely one reason why Coutts wanted to talk to Smeek following the initial ruling