All we really need is for the evaluation to stand the test of CLIFFS. Using standard assumptions (industry tested) would shut themn up. However Clifs will try to come up with a different set of standard assumptions Ie 6% instead of 8%, lower averages for metals prices, higher costs asumptions etc. they will try to cloud the issue so I hope our designates have the i's dotted and the T's crossed....we dont need to hear we made an error in wording...such as NOT did with FWR