whaler,

I'd just finished up my crying with laughter session when I read your typo error claim. Perhaps you could also clairfy if it was typing error(s) that led me on yet another ISM wild goose chase the other night.

In a recent post of yours you advised :See page 228 of Kian's 43-101 for the table showing the assays of the exploration drill holes."

http://agoracom.com/ir/Inspiration/forums/discussion/topics/475676-whats-not-to-like/messages/1535665#message

I noticed you didn't include a link to the page so I was intrigued. I went to the Link Library that you are so fond of telling us to use. I assumed you must be referring to a link titled "Sept 2009 Technical report on Langmuir."

I opened the link, and low and behold the report finished on page 226. Umm thinks I what gives. Decided to waste no more time there, and headed straight to Sedar. I found the same document that I'm still assuming you are referring to, and low and behold the last page of the document was also numbered 226.

I'm not sure if "See page 228 of Kian's 43-101 for the table showing the assays of the exploration drill holes." when what I think you were maybe trying to convey should have been "See page 116 of the Technical Report Of The Langmuir Property Shaw Dome Area NTS 42N/06. An Update As Of September 1, 2009, for the table showing assays of the exploration drill holes" really qualifies as a typo, but I'll let you decide!

Seeing as how you provided no link it could just be that all my assumptions are wrong and somewhere out there is a page 228 of Kian's 43-101 with a table showing assays of the exploration drill holes, but for the life of me I haven't found it yet.

Also for our viewing audience, could you perhaps recall any questions I've asked recently that would warrant an e-mail to the company. As per your following statement:

As such, I don't think it is my job as a hubleader (which has no job decription, contract or wages) on a stock forum to gather up the questions of Nickel77, Surething, Heatseeker, or yourself and seek out answers by calling the company and or contacting IR.

TIA.

PS It wasn't a typo the (3) was just for added emphasis!