whaler,

"Also are the claim maps if you interested in looking at the claim 1313131 that Nickel77 refers to."

When and where did Nickel77 refer to claim 1313131?

Your statement above is about as much use as when you supply only half the depth chart for your friends, or for those without access.

As I've always said, if one has trouble keeping the minor details straight, then what chance does one have with the major details :

Following are some excerpts of what Nickel77 posted. Take notice of what he actually refers to :

Whaler, you have posted all other ISM drilling data on the latest map, but you have forgotten to show the most important drilling data that has taken place on L-2. L-2 is where 85% of ISM’s Micon Resource Numbers come from. In the far right hand side of your map you will note ISM claim number # 1213131. If you could show that claim up close with the drill holes to date, I would think that would help many ISM shareholders understand where the majority of the Resource outlined in the Micon Ni 43-101 comes from.

http://agoracom.com/ir/Inspiration/forums/discussion/topics/475676-whats-not-to-like/messages/1535335#message

With LBE holding the “ace” card with their two properties on the west and south side of ISM’s L-2, along with the Night Hawk Lake boundary being on the east side, there is not many meters for ISM to work with to even contemplate putting in a pit that can get to the substantial part of the Resource defined to date. Bring up the property "1213131" the L-2 sits on and you will clearly see how small this claim really is. Try centering the pit over the Resource defined within the property boundary, then think of the road allowances needed, the angles of the pit, the Night Hawk Lake etc. Simply put, the way things sit now, in my opinion, ISM is in a complete stand still and will not be able to do a thing with L-2 unless LBE gives their okay, and no doubt it will be on all of LBE’s terms, if ever.

http://agoracom.com/ir/Inspiration/forums/discussion/topics/477609-43-101-expectations/messages/1538747#message

As I'm typing this so far three (3) posters have taken the time to give your post referring to the wrong claim number a thumbs up, but not one of them has bothered to take the time to correct you. I can't decide if that falls into the category of a "funny story" or a sad one.