Some posts or links are repeated because by their nature they may reflect a daily or hourly changing status. They are not a constant, do change, so they are in fact not repetitious.

1) house positions

2) 24 hr Nickel price

3) daily trades

4) Technical Analysis sites and links

Some posts may be re-referenced, and or reposted in whole, when they are used in replies to posters who may have either missed the point or in fact have not acknowleged or missed the information presented. A current example

- Turnagain technology possibilties and follow up posts which may show another angle on the same or better detail

-Eg.... Posts by Nickel77 asking of Phase 2 or many other 43-101 related posts

Some posts are reposted when they are in fact very very old and there is a chance that present readship may not have read posts and NR's that are approaching 2 and 3 yrs in age.

Do recall that it was in April 2008 that the Micon commisioning announcement was made. It was Oct 2007 that the Darcel report came out. But any re-reference to such is in fact being repetitive to some degree and I am sure there are readers who have not seen these.

In that same "rule" Vanchester how about this reference highlighted in a different way.

Also included in this category is repetition of the same question, fact or opinion over and over after a response has been provided or if there is currently no ascertainable answer.

Again we get back to the "questions and answers" theme, where either no one has the answers or the gumption to make an attempt in getting the answers directly from the company,