Considering that I watch the daily trading, the bids and the asks (like a hawk).... I can say that I see days where the stock either trades at the ask or the bid in big gaps. As a shareholder, I take notice more so when my holdings drop 10 or 15% in trading rather than when it goes the other way. We both know that in thin trading this stock is at the mercy of the buyers and the sellers and whether they choose to either pay the current ask or sell into the current bid.

As a shareholder, I do care either way matter of fact. As for the original post about it going down and the fact that it is/was CIBC selling it down, you seemed to have missed the whole point of the post in that these guys seem to be pertpetual sellers who must sell. It is my observation that they often hit the bids when they see bidding volumes worthy of selling into. It was also my observation and guess that this may be the result of the company using stock instead of cash to pay for services or land acquisitions. As such these shares will one day be liquidated to become cash so these same recipients can eat one day.

That's the whole point of the original posts and if you notice it is still called "CIBC" which all of you don't seem to care about when posting your latest replies in the same thread?

As for what I like to comment on in the trading is up to me. I am a shareholder and I am long on the stock. I guess as such I will exhibit a little bias. I wish to see the company achieve it's objectives and as a result reward patient investors in the company. On paper and at the end of the day, I do prefer to be up rather than down Vanchester. Is that making sense Vanchester? IMHO