whaler,
"Surething in case you missed it, the question was rhetorical."
The question may have been "rhetorical", but the answer included facts and well, they tend to speak for themselves, or would you care to disagree?
BTW whaler, Mr Miller has stated many things in the past. IMO, very few of them have ever amounted to anything. I'm now wondering if this latest statement of his that you've latched onto, "We continue to be encouraged by the significant progress being in the field in identifying meaningful additional tonnage of nickel mineralization at our Langmuir property and look forward to providing an updated 43-101 by Q1 2011." will become the latest in well, a long list of just plain old rhetoric. Without all the rhetoric there wouldn't really be any need for the so called rhetorical questions would there?
Another Example:
Mr. Randy Miller, the President of the Company, states "The proposed spin-out of Metal Mines will allow the true value of the Langmuir Property to be unlocked and will also allow the Company to focus its attention on the development of its gold and rare earth properties, the value of which is not reflected in the current market price. On the conclusion of the spin-out, the shareholders of the Company will own shares of two high quality companies."
