Whale, just saw your post on the other site, and thanks for that. A good reminder of what we are really sitting on. I'm as giddy as a school boy when I see the results of those extensions from earlier this year. Considering the "true width " results are still shallow (less than a thousand feet below surface), the average grades at LN must be increased from the shallower early holes we saw over the last few years. Key word "shallow". We are only punching 330m deep at max. Could there be more and richer grades even lower (which is usually the case with all other known ore bodies in the Shaw Dome). Just imagine what "could be" at 600m deep that others have drilled.

When i plot the coordinates of those extensions on your map I see those much improved better grades a few hundred metres north of the old collapsed L2 property. And if LN still continues at depth and further north as mentioned in company documents, this ore body MUST run into the Lutha permits as others have alluded too. Seems too obvious to me.

I think you have mentioned this already that the results are only for nickel grades. And Micon is testing for extra credits. Could that have an overall impact of increasing these "shallow" nickel grades on an equivalent basis? I guess the reports can only answer that. Odds are it should to some degree, like it does at every other mine site around Timmins.