Yeah all good points and to the plus for us, as you say. But I just posted that becuase it's onc of those "pending trio of reports" items we are expecting one day. I was looking at it purely as that "the ole Met study" My comment being it can be used as a template for us, simply change the numbers to what ours are.

Yeah we can talk about lots of other comparisons, but I won't becuase I was only interested in seeing what the "Met study" looked like in its delivered and presented NR form. As you say it's an SGS rendering like ours and I wondered if ours will be similar? I wondered if this is all they are, what's the reason it's taking so long?

I would think that once you have selected what is to be your general representative "ore sample" you then go at her and end up with the facts and figures. Purely that , a "Met study"

The rest of the "sales job" is reserved for other reports coming. I note they refer to it as a "preliminary report" until a later more detailed report is posted on their website.

BTW I see Strongbow went up a whopping nickel on this news? In terms of a catalyst to better SP and further increases, Is it being economical? Is it being through the roof or what? Does the average investor care about the technical studies like this? I do know that if it were not economical it would be another story I suspect.

Are we factoring in our own price with all our Harron, Jensen, and Darcel jabber? What will be the street surprise factor? Any?