Whale, interesting comparision. Nice to see something from SGS that we may expect something similiar. A couple of observations. Note how the indicated and inferred sizes drop as cut off grades are raised. This is normal but look how the grades rise! Ill also say that the disclaimers that are quoted throughout the report will no doubt be emphasized by "others" for our own. But thats just standard procedures (like the AIF report). Overall a quick report as there were only 13,000 plus metres of drill core to analyze, (We have 100,000m of core with all properties now- as per MDnA).

Those drill holes do look nice and shallow like ISM's. I did not read their report in detail to see if there is open pit potential at their Nickel King property. No mention of "true width" on those drill results either, so the strike lengths are not as promising.

I then looked at their location. Sort of in the middle of no where. Logistics are nothing near what Timmins and area have. So they definetly have something, question now is how do you get it out of the ground and to market. IMO whats in the ground needs to be proven up further by SBW. And looking at their financials and dilution todate its not all that promising.

Take a look at their board of duirectors. Very strong personnel. However it doesnt make the property any better, does it?

So kuudoos Whale for finding that. A great way to pass the time by reviewing other projects. If anything it further shows just how good ISM will be on its Langmuir property.