Whaler,

When I asked for a "no cut and paste" answer, I was looking for people to answer with some form of interpretation or opinion. By cutting and pasting, you are showing no original thought as to how you interpret whatever the subject may be at the time.

Somehow you think it's a one way street for me on this forum. Always asking questions but never sharing information. I have given my opinion many times here on various subjects and have brought forward relevant material. Case in point was that I thought the 43-101 was going to take a year. Various people gave their opinions and there was some meaningful discussion. In my opinion, that's way more benefical then cutting and pasting passages from easily accessed documents, just to state the obvious. Whether you agree or disagree with what I post is no concern to me, I'm just posting my thoughts. The last time I checked, there is no obligation for people to answer my questions on this forum so if they don't want to, fine, that's their right.

Whaler, why are you so hung up about me providing information from PDAC? I gave an opinion that the release of the 43-101 would not be during PDAC, which you quicky removed from the forum saying it was negative conjecture with no source. My opinion was based on what I was told at PDAC by the ISM representative and wow.... I guess I was right. Funny thing is about a month or so back, I believe Tonyg came out and said he heard that a second geologist had been hired by ISM. No reference as to the source of information (which sounds like conjecture to me) yet I see that it didn't get pulled by either hub leader. In fact, you commented how great this was going to be. Talk about a one way street.

I didn't realize that my behaviour had been "given" nor do I believe I have ever asked for the "time of day". I am not here to win a popularity contest nor am I here to what others call soft bash. I just like to have open discussion on relevant material that petains to ISM.

I see the AIF has been revised but I have only glanced at it. Whaler cannot believe the change in volume but I think I know why. The discussion on the historic drilling, ownership and development of the Langmuir properties and its geology has a completly different writing style than the other parts of the document. The style is very professional, factual and chronological with all references documented. Could it be that this section is part of the 43-101 and was inserted into the AIF? Time will tell.

v.