Sorry Whale, I know you prefer to have a somewhat balanced discussion. I see those with negative views as having one purpose and one purpose only. And yet if anyone dare ask a serious question about THEIR company, it gets yanked or worse (aka ExSudburyGuy).

If an investor feels like debating the lack of a 43-101, fine. State it and move on. But when your own house is burning down, why allow those to continue to repeat the same old, same old questions. its obvious they only have one purpose and that is to create doubt. Which I find funny as one; they clearly are not an investor in ISM, and two, they feel there is something to be gained by bashing other players of the Shaw Dome area. To what logical reason that may have, who will ever know.

I will state right here, that if the ever delayed 43-101 comes in to be the same or higher than the Darcel Report, do you really think these individuals will be apologetic and recant. Don't bet on it. I would guess they will raise the attack to a new level. And why? Even if it were to benefit their own investment? Its not like their position on anything has ever been correct todate! So why allow it.

Each investor has to make up their own mind. To me if a company was raising money at 22 cents in 2005, and found itself at lower levels and scrambling for evermore financing, well my bet there would have been cleared long ago.

Best