"whaler,

I noticed the poster's comments. He was not asking about a possible typo, he was making a sarcastic comment on an obvious typo. Everyone and their dog knew LBE would not be pulling 4500 tonnes per day in pre -production and then going to under 1200 in full production."

How do I or anyone else know what is sarcasm and what is not? I simply posted corrective news release that was sent to me. As you say it looks like Agora and I were doing the same task. Have you given them the same reply to their action?

"However I am sure that everyone was impressed with your "just sent to me now" correction and knowing that you have a live feed has certainly elevated you to a high level of esteem - the fact that Agoracom beat you by a second is not the point, it is knowing that you cared that means so much."

Who cares whether people are impressed or not? You obvoiusly do and if I have helped someone who was either confused or was questioning the earlier news then I am happy. Why all the personal judgement anyhow?

"As you have advised the board how unreasonable I will be in reacting to your efforts, I would not want to let you down. Your post was harmless, but also needless. You still don't seem to get my point that you posting a correction to such an obvious error in LBE information could be taken the wrong way by those who know your past. At 10:11 you say "Liberty and Millright will be left alone. I may post in their off-topic thread if need be". At 10:22, you're on the Liberty forum posting some needless correction. Why not just bite your tongue and resist the urge to impress those at the LBE forum."

Well you certainly did not let me or the other readers down. I posted directly to the discussion forum as this is ontopic and relevant tot he post to which I replied. In fact Agora posted their correction in the same discsussion forum. Again I refer you to my answer above with respect to your conclusion that I am out to impress.

"That being said, I'd like to congratulate you on your about face, and your commitment to leave Liberty [the forum] alone. Leaving millright alone has become a non-issue - there is no more "Agoracom" millright. I would also congratulate you on removal of the distasteful post by Beerbelly. Whoever convinced you that reversing your stance was of mutual benefit to all concerned, should also be commended."

Anyone breaking the rules faces the consequences.

"The whole exercise was likely worth the inconvenience. It shows the prompt and aggressive way in which Agoracom acts to enforce their view of acceptable behavior. As you pointed out, "it seems that [the Hub Leader] does not have the authority to remove all posts". This is good - it relieves you of the pressures that were being applied on you to settle some non Agoracom vendetta by misusing your authority."

More importantly I would say it removes personal bias and leaves the one who has been given the power and authority to remove posts out of the pending review. Personal bias or slant or presumption or what have you. Saner heads will prevail

"It was made evident that outbursts of childish name calling are reserved for the school playgrounds - not Agoracom. And the individual who chose to exhibit his tasteless and vulgar personality on the forum has had his 15 minutes of fame, has had his posts removed, changed his avatar and remove his bigoted remarks from his profile."

Correct. I would encourage anyone wanting that kind of excahnge to take it outside and continue posting at Stockhouse where it seems to be tolerated from past posting.

"So whaler, aside from your little side trip this AM, I am pleased that you have accepted my original position that there should be a "no fly zone", as you put it.

You better reread my posts. I have said that anyone can post anywhere as long as it follows the rules of TOS etc. Compliance with Agora's site rules is what I follow. If need be they will address what some may interpret and or tag as a possible violation.

I think most will agree that, given the past history, there is mutual benefit in not just being governed by the rules - but going a bit higher and avoiding the temptations in the gray area. Just a suggestion - why not avoid the temptation of getting involved on the off topic forum, and insure that it does not spread to the general forum. I doubt that there is much need for a general comment from either of us - on each other's hub -"

I did not accept any such thing!. I cannot take responsibility for what is or isn't posted on any investor site. I can take corrective action here if there is non compliance or vilation. At other site I may report what may be thought to be a viloation. Again you are trying to impose what you think should be the rules for essentially establishing each others sites as off-limits. A "no fly zone" as I described it last night. I see that as heavy handed. I see that also as browbeating for investors who are. Why the exert that type of control? Please re-read what was posted by the Agora account exec as acceptable posting. If we are interested in balance and good exchange then let it be as it was meant to be.

1)essentially invested companies that border each other within the Shaw dome.

2)Have possible mutual mining interests.

3)Are effected my similar external market factors, as it applies to Nickel and it's discovery, processing, world consumption and supply.

" and congratulations on the acquisition of the other company's stock would likely be more meaningful by PM."

That may be the way to go.

This will be my last post on the ISM forum, provided you do not drift back into the "no fly zone".

Please read above