Steven,

I hate to have to repeat myself, but you are wrong about your understanding about the WIPO report, and your conclusion that: "based on the standing opinion stated it, it stands as not meeting the requirements for a patent" is in my opinion complete Bull.

Just like your claim that  "the entire value of the company hinges on a favourable ruling" is completely out of touch with reality...

These are lies being fed to you by the bashers... and each time you repeat them they win...

Trying to make a correlation between the patent and recent market activity is complete fantasy.  But by doing that you play into their hands...

Peter of Pyro covered this subject and I covered this subject many times, and yet you keep repeating the same lies.

Link to Peter answer...      Link to my past reply on the subject: 

So let me be very clear, the national the patent application submitted is the same document in the WIPO document...

Why you may ask, simple, PyroGenesis and HPQ are very confident we will get the patent.  How confident... You will see soon enough... 

One last point, I do see the action on the share price, and as a large shareholder that just invested $77,000 more in December, I feel the pain.... but since I am in this for the long term, I am not worried that I will not do well with my investment.

This may not have been the answer you sought, but it is the only one I can give...

Regards,

Bernard Tourillon

CEO