There are several votes. As I understand it they take only the following vote from the agenda, which (as I understand it) does not refer to position limits. So the vote on position limits is probably still on and I understood they have a majority for that after Chilton gave in to a watered down ruling.

"The proposed rule would place caps on the voting stakes that banks and other financial players such as JPMorgan (JPM.N), Goldman Sachs (GS.N) and Morgan Stanley (MS.N) control in derivatives clearing houses and trading venues in an effort to reduce conflicts of interest. It is among some of the most controversial derivatives proposals being proposed by the agency, with big banks saying it's wrong to limit their voting power when they are the ones putting their own capital at risk in clearing houses."