Re: Right on schedule...successfu... retest of lows - PIC
posted on
Mar 10, 2010 08:04PM
Golden Minerals is a junior silver producer with a strong growth profile, listed on both the NYSE Amex and TSX.
"I give 66% chance that gold and silver lows are in for the week. This goes up to 80% tomorrow no matter what gold and silver do....and silver's low actually probably came in yesterday."
Don't understand this statement, why would it go up to 80% tomorrow, irrespective of what gold and silver do? In that case, wouldn't it be 80% today already?
Pic, I tried to give you a compliment this morning; I can understand why you read everything I direct at you with a suspicious mind, and I freely admit, there are things about you that I find annoying, but so what. As opposed to anyone else's posts, I 'pic' yours out and read them first. The reasons:
they contain valuable information relative to the future trends of precious metals. And you rarely attach anything, so they are quick and easy to read and digest. It's only rarely that you make a comment as I've quoted above, where I don't know what you mean. I find your points relative to support and such to be very well supported and quite accurate, in a field where if you're right 55% of the time, you're doing really well;
you don't hate America;
you are not overly pessimistic, in fact, you're somewhat optimistic and upbeat;
you have an interesting style, the stuff you write about the planets is interesting; I don't happen to buy into it, but, hey, like I said this morning, you're at least as accurate as the so-called experts (not a good enough compliment for you?? LOL).
As you are one of the most, if not the most, prolific poster on this board, I think it's not unreasonable to offer some analysis of your style. I stick to my point that being right is important to you, just like it is to everyone else - how else can you expect people to value your posts? You took that as a negative, it's a neutral observation, which you say is not right, okay, fine - again, a point of minor and insignificant disagreement.
Gildage is over the top; his criticism is totally unfair. And we don't want him to begin posting regarding his BM's (unless, of course, he can show a correlation between them and the price of PM's.
By the way, you really don't know what is going on with ECU, but no one else seems to, either. It's been a great disappointment these last three years, notwithstanding everyone's predictions to the contrary.