Watching Paulson squirm on that clip, as well as several other clips on that site from vhf, says to me that at least some members of congress appear to be fed up with the shenanigans of Goldman Sachs, Paulson, the fed, etc. Finally? Maybe?

I just hope all this finger pointing and seriousness isn't all just more hot air from these guys as they blow some smoke around before going back to business as usual.

Thank goodness for UTube and the non main-stream press. They're doing a nice end-run around the silent, so-called main-street press. As UTube and the other outlets continue to pour on the gas, Congress may finally be finessed into actually doing something worthwhile. I just hope the momentum continues to build.

In that regard, Peter Brimelow gets in his two cents today with a nice summary of the increasing attacks on Goldman Sachs with links to several of the most recent eye-opening reports.

--------------------

From GATA:

Submitted by cpowell on 11:05AM ET Monday, July 20, 2009. Section: Daily Dispatches

By Peter Brimelow
MarketWatch.com
Monday, July 20, 2009

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/is-grousing-about-goldman-reaching-crit...

NEW YORK -- I'm amazed: Grousing about Goldman Sachs, and fury at the financial sector, is actually reaching the point where something might happen -- maybe even answers to questions we've been asking for a while.

As Jim Bianco of Bianco Research just noted in his News Clips/Daily Commentary service: "The amount of bad news that [Goldman Sachs Group] is generating with its record earnings is incredible. We cannot remember a company that has received so much scorn for making money."

Bianco linked to critical stories in the Economist (http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14034...) and the New York Times (http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14034...) and a scathing op-ed column ("The Joy of Sachs") by Paul Krugman (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/opinion/17krugman.html?ref=opinion).

And that's only the beginning. Last week, Arianna Huffington in her liberal Huffington Post Webzine actually issued bipartisan praise of two Wall Street Journal pieces critical of Goldman and the bailout. Her article is here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/shattering-the-right-vs...

The Wall Street Journal articles are here:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124762129423442667.html

And here:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124762005061042587.html

It's many years since Arianna and I were on the same politically incorrect side of one of William F. Buckley's "Firing Line" debates. She has since adroitly changed sides, and if she now thinks it's time to attack Goldman Sachs -- a major Democratic donor -- the firm is in trouble.

The most spectacular attack on Goldman Sachs: Matthew Taibbi's Rolling Stone article "The Great American Bubble Machine," posted in Rolling Stone magazine July 13:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/29127316/the_great_american_b...

This is a follow-up to Taibbi's earlier attack on the bailout, which he portrayed all too convincingly as a sort of Wall Street coup d'etat.

Taibbi describes the extraordinary personnel interlock between Goldman Sachs and Washington, apparently regardless of the party in power. He thinks that a key development was the emergence of Robert Rubin, who became Goldman's co-chairman and then Bill Clinton's Treasury secretary.

Taibbi writes: "If America is circling the drain, Goldman Sachs has found a way to be that drain. ... The bank's unprecedented reach and power have enabled it to turn all of America into a giant pump-and-dump scam, manipulating whole economic sectors for years at a time, moving the dice game as this or that market collapses, and all the time gorging itself on the unseen costs that are breaking families everywhere."

Of the bailout, he writes: "The numbers show that Goldman essentially borrowed a $5 billion salary payout for its executives in the middle of the global economic crisis it helped cause, using half-baked accounting to reel in investors, just months after receiving billions in a taxpayer bailout."

Sounds wild, but Taibbi makes a case. As a Rolling Stone reader says in the article's comment thread: "The last time I read anything this scary was the New Yorker article about Burmese pythons taking over Florida."

I've been reporting for years that key investment letters had come to the conclusion that the financial markets have been manipulated. Now this suspicion is all over the mainstream media. Hmmm.

The scale that would be involved is so spectacular that it dwarfs another issue the letters have been asking about for years: whether the gold price has been systematically suppressed. (See my April 20 column:http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gloom-about-gold-except-among.) Manipulating gold is an afterthought compared to what was allegedly going on.

I continue to think that a key part of this story is the mysterious 1998 Rubin-orchestrated rescue of Long Term Capital.

And I'm increasingly confident all this will end with the appointment of another Pujo Committee, paralleling the one which investigated the so-called "Money Trust" in the wake of the Panic of 1907.

The consequences will be monumental.