MoneyWeek is one of the most respected business publications out of London, U.K. Posted below is an interesting little article that appeared yesterday. Using the top trader's "ten for" methodology, we may soon see silver at $500 an ounce.

Not bad - VHF

-

Why Gold Could Hit $8500 an Ounce

MoneyWeek

Dominic Frisby

11.06.2008

From the late ‘80s until now, that sleazy operator inflation barely got a mention, though we were living through two decades of never-before-seen money supply growth. Who cared? He was serenading stocks and houses and we were getting richer. “That’s nice,” we said, “but ssshh”.

But now the old cad has dumped poor, dear housing and stocks for a new lover: commodities – food, metals and energy – and polite society is outraged. “How could he?” we are all saying. And that’s part of the problem – the fact that we are all suddenly talking about inflation. The genie is out of the bag and it’s going to be impossible to get him back in.

That hasn’t prevented the world’s top central bankers from going on a concerted genie-suppressing effort. Bernanke, King and Trichet have all spoke out on the subject this week. But it is too late for that. Pandora’s Box has been opened.

In the long-term it does not matter what central bankers say. What matters is what they have done. Gold and oil are going to go a lot higher. But how high? I’ll tell you. Perhaps $8,500 for gold and $400 for oil.

Here’s why…

The first thing to note is that Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke’s words last week and again this week did send the gold price down. We must thank him for that – he’s given us another buying opportunity. As I said before, I still see $850 an ounce, or just below, as an obvious floor, and that is where I – and probably half the world’s hedge-funds – have placed my buy-orders.

Central bankers can’t talk down inflation

But despite all the rhetoric, nobody has actually done anything yet. Is Bernanke really going to raise rates by anything significant, just as we head into a derivatives crisis? Even my granny’s budgie knows you can’t raise rates when a business downturn is accelerating. Trichet’s hands are similarly tied. Despite the German terror of inflation, the problems in Spain, Ireland and Italy are just too pronounced. Mervyn King also seems to understand the inflationary danger we are in, but can you see him embarking on a major rate-raising cycle with the spectre of Gordon Brown breathing down his neck like some ghoulish character out of Lord Of The Rings?

So instead they are concentrating on ‘inflation expectations’ – the perception of the problem. But if your house is going down in value, if your salary is not rising, (indeed if your job is under threat), if your pension pot has emptied and your earnings are buying you less and less each year, it does not matter how loudly the central bankers shout about it - everything around you, from the wind in the trees to the traffic, will be screaming inflation.

How typical of today’s authorities to be more worried the perception of inflation than inflation itself. It is like being more concerned about the employment numbers – or what people think of the employment numbers – than with the serious problem of unemployment. It shows the shallow world of soundbite and lazy policy in which we now live. Sooner or later it will come back and bite us all, but by then it will be too late.

Mark my words, inflation is about to accelerate as the authorities attempt to deal with this now-inevitable derivatives crisis. I would advise you to keep your eyes on the inflation train coming down the track, rather than the butterflies on the buddleia on the sidings that the central bankers would have you look at.

The next big bubble – and it ain’t commodities

Why, oh why would anyone buy a bond or a gilt? You might get yields of 3%, 4% or 5%, but the cost of living is patently rising by so much more than that. Virtually guaranteed to lose purchasing power, it just doesn’t make any sense.

So why are people buying them? It’s because bonds are perceived as safe. But I can’t help but think now that the inflation genie is out, more and more people will come to realise the truth about the declining purchasing power of their money and move their funds elsewhere.

There’s been endless talk of commodities being in a bubble. Oil is in a bubble, we hear. But supply has to exceed demand in a bubble. It does not. Last February for the first time in the history of the world demand for oil exceeded production – that situation has remained the case for 90 days. But there is no supply shortage of bonds. And you have to question the real value and use of the underlying asset.

The bubble, if it’s anywhere, is in bonds and they, in my humble opinion, will be the next one to pop.

How high will gold and oil go?

Well, history shows us what is possible.

The most obvious time to look to for parallels is the 1970s. Then the gold price went from the artificially suppressed price of $35 an ounce to $850. That is a rise of, give or take, 2,500%. A similar 2,500% rise from the artificially suppressed 1999 low of $250 would take us to $6,250. That is what happened before.

However, there are lots of differences between then and now: in those days interest rates were higher, the threat from derivatives was not as pronounced, debt was lower, there was not such a global crisis in banks, money supply growth was not so out of control, and crucially, Gordon Brown and Ben Bernanke were not in charge. So perhaps $6,250 is a little conservative.

Michael Hampton, who is the best trader I know, uses all sorts of cycles and technical indicators in his work and is continually looking for fractal (repeating) patterns. Among other things, he has what he calls his simple ‘ten for’ rule. Let me explain.

He argues that a 1970s dollar had about ten times the value of a 2000 vintage dollar. For example, the S&P averaged around 100 in the 1970s. It is over 1,000 this decade. Similarly the Dow averaged around 800-1,000, while for the Noughties that figure is around 10,000. Gold began the ‘70s at $35, it began the ‘00s at almost $300.

He uses the same argument for oil. It went from low single-digits to $13 by the end of the 1974 oil crisis. Now oil has gone from $10 to over $130. By the end of the decade oil went from $13 to almost $40. So Mr Hampton, not unreasonably in my view, has a possible eventual target of $400 for oil (which he sees by 2012-13, by the way).

Some food for thought.