Gartman today on gold and IMF sales and legacy bank gold sales
posted on
Apr 10, 2008 11:31AM
Golden Minerals is a junior silver producer with a strong growth profile, listed on both the NYSE Amex and TSX.
Regarding gold, of which we are reasonably long, we note
that gold is indeed moving in contravention to the US
dollar, and no one should be surprised. We've made it
quite clear that we're prepared to add to our long
positions in gold when and only when the EUR trades
upward through 1.5850 and remains there for an hour or
two to prove the movement's validity. We stand by that
statement this morning, noting further that spot gold itself
is, for the first time since mid-March on the hourly charts,
breaking a recent rally high, having held well above its
most recent lows. It did so yesterday when spot gold
moved upward through $923-$925. It remains there this
morning with spot gold trading $931 as we write.
We are all the more impressed by gold's strength in light
of the IMF statement that it intends to push ahead with
gold sales from its reserves, as reported here yesterday.
However, as we also reported, in order for those gold
sales to be effected, the US Congress must agree. Given
that this is an election year, we cannot imagine that any
incumbent Senator or Congressman or woman will want
to go on the record as having supported sales of US gold
to foreign interests. That simply will not "play" well in
Peoria, or Keokuk, or Eden Prairie, or Wilmington. It will
not happen, and thus the prospects of IMF gold sales
cannot and will not happen until after the turn of the new
year... if then.
Further, we note, interestingly, from the ECB's weekly
statement of condition, that not one "legacy" central bank
of Europe sold gold last week. We may be wrong on this,
and we are ready to stand corrected, but we do not
believe that this has happened since the Washington
Agreement went into effect back in '99. Perhaps it was
the quarter end that kept the banks upon the sidelines, or
perhaps it was some other reason that we know nothing
about, but we find it interesting nonetheless. We wonder
then if there will be a doubling of gold sales "this week," to
catch-up the gold sales needed by the WAG signatories
to reach the 500 tonne limit. We wonder further, what if
they do not double up their normal weekly gold sales?
What then shall that mean? Certainly it'll not be bearish.