Moose you have a nose for value. I agree whole heartedly.
Prove up the low certainty and only then go after the unexplored territory.
But I do not think they need a thorough review, it is self evident.
Review only for the fine details that may be needed, after all they want to be thoroughly 43-101 compliant so that there will not be the hassles with the release of the next report.
This is where my disapointment with the conference comes from. It seems to me crystal clear as to what needs to be done it is just the details of how to do it that need to be discussed and reviewed. That should have taken place by now and presented at the conference. jmo.