Re: An example of the GNH Attitude
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 21, 2013 10:26PM
New Discovery Resulting in a 20KM Mineralized Gold Belt
I'm sorry, I have stayed away from contributing to this ongoing dialogue over the past month or more choosing instead to drop in every once in a while and catch up on the posts. I remain loyal to my original opinion and Mr. Earl, I have to tell you when I read this last post of yours I am convinced there is a period or comma missing in the number in your first line.
Up until this very day no one I can ever dream of loses $1/4 million on a venture, exploration junior company on the TSXV with these economic and lending conditions without either (a) having information they thought was theirs alone and chose to rely on it or (b) was stranded on a desert island with no possible way to place a stop-loss at that investment level.
Now, hate me if you want but seriously, are we now to listen to your sage advise on how best to turn this company around, raise share value, replace knowledgable management, drop salaries/remuneration on your call and then having accomplished all that lead the rush to buy more? You have raised issues which are generic only IMO and other than compensation and who sold shares when, that's the extent of the issues upon which you hang your hat. This is obviously the hill upon you wish to die.
You champion a personal cause and I respectfully suggest your file legally or write off the losses against what I am sure are other substantial gains.
Sorry, but that's enough as far as I'm concerned.
With my usual best regards,