Re: Deep bulk sample
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 10, 2011 03:58PM
New Discovery Resulting in a 20KM Mineralized Gold Belt
Dear Pender et al.,
I'm not sure where the deep bulk sample rumor started but as far as I am aware there is currently no attempt to do this type of sampling on the property. Two nights ago I spent a relaxing (or at least it was relaxing until we saw Pacioretty get hit on the big screen at the ACC) evening with Frank Candido discussing the plans for the company going forward. While he was frustrated with the current sp he is VERY excited about the future.
I called him today to ask for permission to share with you all some of the recent developments and to put into context the bulk sampling at depth discussion. First of all, the company is extremely excited about todays news release and the apparent extension of the T1/T2 zones along strike. Of course the assays will have to tell the story but I think we can all agree that increased tonnage in that zone is exciting.
Secondly, and perhaps more to the point on bulk sampling is the fact that GNH has entered discussions with a firm that may ultimately help them develop their 43-101 and also advise them on how best to deal with the nuggety deposit/grade and tonnage. There are multiple solutions to the grade at depth one of which includes a ramp and bulk sampling. This, however, is not the only way to solve this problem. Apparently there are other drill-based approaches that may better suit this particular deposit and we will not know this until all of the data is evaluated by the firm, the firm is hired by GNH, the plan is proposed, the plan is agreed upon by GNH board and put in motion. I am assured that we will all be appropriately informed as the critical steps in this process are reached.
I liked the NR this morning- when Tilsley et al get excited... I get excited. It was nice to see some you at PDAC. Looking forward to our next meeting.
Best,
Scott