Skier dont you think part of the problem before was everyone was expecting results to yield 100 3 g/t because of posts like that? I think that has partly hurt the SP so much when they got 10 m or less. (Yes i know i had posts like that)

Its fine to be optomistic but it might be better surved to keep those predictions to yourself. Last thing GNH shareholders want is for people to sell on Bulk sampling results because they had in their mind to expect 250 m at 5 g/t. Then when they didnt see that they saw the results as poor which maybe they really weren't.

Are Bulk sampling results that much more accurate then drilling results are? When GNH dimond drilled into mineralization even the deeper holes only found 3 m of gold at 1.5 g/t. Is it realistict to assume that bulk sampling that same hole would result in 200 m 3 g/t ? that would obviously mean the drill samples missed a heck of alot of gold.