I don't know if this topic has ever been discussed here so I have a question regarding full pulp metallic assays. If we know that our deposit is nuggety in nature and that is the case everywhere on the property, why not just do full pulp metallic on all samples? I know it is more expensive; however wouldn't it save time and the extra cost of having to redo the same sample? And in turn would enable the team to analyze the results faster giving the team the info it needs to move the drilling at a faster pace because they would know where to drill next. I am not a geo so I may be completely off the wall here. I am pretty sure Jim Tilsley knows what he is looking at (mineralization) when examining a drill core. Thoughts anyone?