personally, these initial "headline" results were better than i expected, especially considering the holes and areas they represent (unless we get a real curveball, the best is yet to come imo).

i dont see where the drill whole data is posted yet (and some of the maps seem to have changed). i think we'll be getting info on holes "piecemeal" for at least the next few weeks but it does look like they are getting a picture together.

question for you mineheads: it's still very early but when you look at the map's for T1, T2 & 88 it almost seems like we are getting much longer intercepts at low grade in the northwest and much higher grade with shorter intercepts as we go southeast...what does this mean? the VG hits at 88 would seem to promote this "bigger nugget" theory also...

i guess what i'm saying is that the "nuggets" seem to be "bigger" as we travel southeast, almost as if the gold "coagulated" better in some areas. i know it's not "sexy" but unless i'm reading it wrong we already have over 350 meters in t1 at 1gr/t (without the glory holes and without the nugget effect) see the drill map labeled "T1 and T2 Zones Section Holes BD2010-115, 119, 125
and 132" and look in the upper left corner.

.....i'm also wondering if we might have to adjust our assay procedures for bigger nuggets (could that be part of the 25ppb question?)