pos, our recent 43-101 "20.0 recommendations" states what we should do next at a cost of $3,350,000. subject to updated data and changes....my personal thoughts are that we establish some form of multiplier for drill data. i'm just guessing but from a business standpoint i'd say that dwek recieved some assurances on what the company plan was and if it changes i'm sure he will be consulted on why.

imo the only way you can show the mining industry what we have will be via bulk sampling at depth in an area that we have sufficient drill core sampling. while snow white might give us our best results i'd think t1-t2 have the most core data that could be averaged against bulk sampling to create a multiplier.

just wishful thinking at this point but: if <1gr/T turns into 3gr/T at T1-T2 with bulk sampling then drill core returns of 2gr/T at snow white would equal 6gr/T....i believe we're getting closer all the time.

tilsley will have to establish some form of multiplier to be able to sell a 43-101 resource imo