..blows my mind.

Blows my mind because someone relatively intelligent took the time to thoroughly read this hub as part of her investigation process and then carefully crafted that piece....complete with references to km between Ancaster and Quebec, price quotes etc. It's nice to know someone cares.

I have nothing to say in the manner of defending GNH in respect of this 'article' that hasn't been covered ad nauseaum on this hub already. I've always welcomed well constructed arguments against buying GNH as an investment, and this certainly fits into that category.

I do take personal offense to her critiques of Frank and the insinuation that he is a sheister. Frank is a big boy and doesn't need me to defend him but when you characterize a guy like Frank in that way without ever having spoke to him (obviously) it puts you at a level that is lower than hydraulic fracturing could ever go (as low as you can go).

I also think it is fairly weak to write such a scathing report and make several assumptions without contacting the company for comment. Of course, that would imply journalistic integrity, but given the source....well...was there a source? Journalistic integrity need not apply.

At the end of the day, the revelation of the assays will tell the true story. It's a junior gold play on the Venture Exchange. Anybody who expects less than what has transpired to this point needs to reset their expectations.

B