notster, after reviewing the sgh map i'm confused as to why the area in the NE, south of the road zone with a couple smaller red blobs >85-90% is rated 5 out of 6 while the area northeast of the road zone has a much bigger red blob >90% is rated a 4.5??

is the rating a better indicator than the percentile??

drill hole 118 went thru the big red blob area rated a 4.5 (results were ok)

drill holes 101-105 went thru the area south of the roadzone rated 5 (results not as good?)

i think there is something to this SGH but i'm not sure they know what to look for yet... i guess the snow white results might be a good indication if they are getting the process refined. it seems that the SGH might be a good indicator of an area to drill in, but the geological make-up of the deposit makes an exact location difficult to pinpoint...

judging by the progressive improvement of results by drill hole it does seem that they are slowly figuring out where to drill. i cant wait to see the assays...hole 138 is one to keep an eye on imo.