When it comes to the claims map, I believe the most up to date and clear map is the one which GNH has published. It is very detailed and clear as to who has what and I put 100% faith in what GNH publishes to the market. I think UBR have to do some updating to their web-site. Not sure how many have been here for at least 1 year, but I must tell you that GNH have done wonderful things with their web-site over this past year, and it has evolved into one of the best, most informative ones which I have ever seen for this type of company.

As far as marketing goes I agree with everybody :) That's easy. Good points all around. There has been alot of hype published about ATC even them stating that they might have a Carlin Style type trend and personally I think they crossed the line on that statement. Just because there are similarities in the host rock doesn't mean it is so, and comparing your claims to something so massive at such an early stage is misleading. Currently they are only exploring 6 months of the year and there is no mention of following a NI 43-101 (as far as I can find) or even having a qualified person for reporting 43-101 on site. The numbers they have reported to the market are only drill holes which are interesting. I'm still trying to figure out why they SP jumped so fast and the only thing I can really find is that when they made mention of "Carlin Style Deposit" with a few interesting holes the SP jumped, from $2 to $7 in one week.

So, maybe on our next NR when we show some interesting holes to the market we should at that time make a statement of what our short term objective is, ie. 100 million/t/ore hopefully greater than 1.5-2g/t. and bulk sampling attempting to prove a grade closer to 3g/t. which is what historical bulk sampling results have shown. Also mention that we are following NI 43-101 standards in order to define the deposit in the future as inferred.

:) Skier