Mtl Gold,

I find that your points are valid if you make three assumptions:

1) that the assays in question are indeed officially on rush order

2) that the specific assay protocol(s) requested by GNH and required for accurate determination of gold content in our samples can be "rushed" in the ActLabs facility (for example perhaps this rush timeline applies only to fire assays but not to total pulp metallic assays)

3) That re-assays of the results were not required to verify anomalous values.

I do not have independent confirmation that all of these assumptions are true and this is why I am not concerned. If you find that indeed, all of these assumptions are true, we would be grateful to learn that information.

Best,

Scott