Glorieux, I thought I'd bein bed by now,but I've been curious to see the reaction to my mildly provocative post. Not bad so far! :) BTW, thanks for the kind PM.

I think Hoov said it earlier. The last PM was all about "Snow White". I am trying to glean all I can about what is going on there, and thank you very much for the additional insights, but at the end of the day, it will take more than the assays for one hole to move me. #127 may be that additional hole. Before or after the assays I don't know yet. That decision all comes down to price (and of course that most volatile of factors, mood.)

T1 is very impressive, but being that some of the numbers seem to be all over the map, somewhat confusing too. I don't need another lecture about the nugget effect. I get it, for the most part. :) If a minimum 3 g/t can stand up over the long haul, and if 1000m can be proven, I like it a lot. But that's the other elephant in the room, now isn't it. The other day one of our posters yelled out "94 million tonnes confirmed!" I guess my definition of "confirmed" is somewhat more conservative than most.

T1 is after all, the reason we are still poking around the area. It was the historical focal point, and until something else is proven to be greater, it still is. I feel that the greater part of the current share price IS T1. The premium for blue sky has probably been extinguished somewhat.

If the goods are there, and if the company reports them completely and coherently, it will come back.

Good night,

For real this time,

Johnny