Nice calculations. Nice to see somebody 'coming out' with some of these ridiculous numbers that everyone is afraid to talk about. At my count, that makes about 5 of us...:)

I´m never afraid to talk about potential, even if it sounds "too good to be true".

I´ve been called a "perma-bull" at the NOT board for my belief in the enormous potential of that company (which I still believe in) and I see the stars aligning here as well.

Maybe in an even better way because of the people involved here.

It´s still a long way to fame and fortune, but maybe not that long (not talking of daytrader time horizons here, though).

Your question about SGH:

So we could be finding a lot more good stuff as we learn more the deeper we go. (off the top of my head, I thhink the geochem is good for 200m depth - anybody?)

For anybody interested, I would like to refer to the ActLabs Report on SGH (alot more interesting information in there):

http://www.goldenhopemines.com/userfiles/Activation%20Labs%20Gold%20Signature%20Report%20sept2009.pdf

ActLabs is quite confident with 500m depth for delineating targets.

Looking forward to more failure in falsifying Mr. Tilsley´s theory !

FANTOMAS