I have read many posts about how the average grade in the cores will be around half of what has been represented in the bulk samples. From what I understand it is based on issues with the sample size/nuggetty gold that results in the problems with understated grades in cores.

My question is, could the grade not also be overstated based on these smaller sample sized? e.g. we'll probably get back some extremely high grade asseys based on the visual gold sections, will these not average out or even overstate our overall grade?

TIA