Re: Charts & Comments - Thompson
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 01, 2013 11:09AM
Saskatchewan's SECRET Gold Mining Development.
via 321Gold - Regarding Sell-Side Positions
source: http://www.321gold.com/editorials/thomson_s/thomson_s_010113.html
The abolishment of the 'no-down-tick' rule in 2011, coupled with a drastic curtailment of production and stockpiling of ore in 2012 and a major price correction in gold all contributed to an aggressive feeding frenzy of naked short selling in GBN.V shares. There were few buyers if any, some long term shareholders sold. Pricing in the stock became capricious, seemingly without any fundamental.
Brokerages and traders sold shares first who did not own any, in order to raise capital for a hedged position in long-dated treasury futures. Bank clients looking for a yield also bought into contracts with the underlying obligation to buy back naked shorted shares, believing that gold companies were finished. Banks provided lending so that clients could buy these contracts and make money on the spread between benchmark lending rates and contractual yield.
The preferred vehicle of this strategy is the equity swap. The last reported short position by Bloomberg was a negative number, meaning a negative carry. The percentage of the float that was negative carry was the entire publicly held float of GBN.V shares, not held by insiders and Sprott.
People have forgotten that readily available contractual obligations e-mailed to clients do not make for a hard asset. The miner is the hard asset, not the equity swap.
-F6