Welcome To The Golden Arrow Resources Corporation HUB On AGORACOM

Edit this title from the Fast Facts Section

Free
Message: Golden Arrow Reports Additional Drill Results at Chinchillas Silver Project

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwired - Feb. 4, 2016) - Golden Arrow Resources Corporation (TSX VENTURE:GRG)(FRANKFURT:GAC)(WKN:A0B6XQ) ("Golden Arrow") is pleased to announce the results of assaying of an additional 14 drill holes in the Phase V drilling program at the Chinchillas Silver Project in Jujuy Province, Argentina. Previous results from the program were reported in news releases dated December 2nd, 2015, December 16th, 2015, January 11th, and January 20th, 2016. The drilling program is part of the Chinchillas Project pre-development activities, funded by Silver Standard, which are being undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of creating a combined mining business with Silver Standard's Pirquitas mine, as announced October 1st, 2015. The drilling program is on-going and additional results will be announced as assays are received.

Selected highlights from these drill holes include:

  • 151 g/t silver, 2.0% lead and 1.3% zinc over 61 metres in CGA-258
    • Includes 675 g/t silver, 4.4% lead and 3.4% zinc over 1 metre
    • And 403 g/t silver, 3.7% lead and 1.2% zinc over 3 metres
    • And 640 g/t silver, 8.6% lead over 2 metres
  • 186 g/t silver, 1.1% lead and 0.5% zinc over 38 metres in CGA-259
    • Including 347 g/t silver, 0.8% lead and 0.6% zinc over 5 metres
    • And 420 g/t silver, 5.5% lead and 0.7% zinc over 2 metres
  • 203 g/t silver, 1.6% lead and 1.0% zinc over 21 metres in CGA-249
    • Including 388 g/t silver, 2.6% lead and 1.4% zinc over 6 metres
  • 245 g/t silver, 0.5% lead and 0.5% zinc over 20 metres in CGA-255
    • Including 853 g/t silver and 0.6% zinc over 2 metres

The Phase V drill program started on October 19th, 2015 and since then over 13,000 metres of drilling has been completed, with approximately 2,000 metres of the program remaining. The program is comprised mainly of infill holes in the Silver Mantos and Mantos Basement zones to upgrade the Mineral Resource categories, plus five geotechnical holes to support slope angle recommendations for the potential future pits, drilling to characterize ground waters in the project area, and condemnation drilling around the deposit.

Table 1 below includes the assay results from 14 diamond drill holes totaling 1,550 metres in length, including one hole drilled to characterize ground water. A map of the drill hole locations is available on the Chinchillas map page on the Golden Arrow website at: http://www.goldenarrowresources.com/i/maps/4-NR5-Map-Feb-4-2016.pdf.

Chinchillas Deposit Geology

The Chinchillas deposit is a volcanic vent system in which explosive volcanic activity produced diatreme breccias and tuffs in the upper part of the vent and brecciated the underlying Ordovician basement meta-sediments. Silver-lead-zinc mineralization in the tuff and tuff breccia units is disseminated within thick mantos (layers), and in the basement is mainly within the fractures of the breccias. Mineralization occurs in four main zones: to the west is situated the Silver Mantos tuff-hosted zone and the Mantos Basement zone; to the east is situated the Socavon del Diablo ("Socavon") tuff-hosted zone and the Socavon Basement zone. The zones are described in detail in the most recent NI 43-101 Technical Report, filed under Golden Arrow's SEDAR profile dated November 2nd, 2015.

Drill Hole Details

Mineralized intercepts greater than 20g/t silver and 0.5% lead and 0.5% zinc are reported in Table 1.

Holes CGA-248, CGA-249, CGA-250, CGA-251, CGA-252, CGA-254 and CGA-255 were drilled to infill the central-south part of the Silver Mantos zone. Assays from these holes confirmed near-surface mineralization with several intersections of substantial grade and widths, similar to those reported from earlier holes in the vicinity.

Holes CGA-253 and CGA-256 were drilled to infill the northern portion of the Silver Mantos and test for an extension of high grade mineralization from hole CGA-193 (reported on December 16, 2015). CGA-253 returned no significant intercepts and those from CGA-256 were minor.

Holes CGA-258, CGA-259 and CGA-261 were drilled to infill the Mantos Basement and all encountered mineralization at the expected depth, just below the contact with the tuff unit.

Hole CGA-257 was a twin hole to CGA-40 and confirmed the mineralization with similar widths and grades.

Holes CGA-260W and CGA-262W were located in the Socavon del Diablo area adjacent to the main creek and were drilled to allow the installation of piezometers to monitor ground water. Hole CGA-260W was drilled with a diamond drill and samples were therefore sent for analysis, with the results reported in Table 1. CGA-262W was drilled with a rotary drill and no samples were recovered or sent for analysis.

Table 1. Drill Intercepts >20g/t for Ag and >0.5% for Pb and Zn

TARGET HOLE Note From (metres) To (metres) Length (metres) Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%)
Silver Mantos CGA-248 20 38 18.0 89 0.8
50 51 1.0 27 0.5
60 61 1.0 26
Silver Mantos CGA-249 11 32 21.0 203 1.6 1.0
including 22 28 6.0 388 2.6 1.4
36 41 5.0 21
46 48 2.0 1.0
48 50 2.0 58 4.1
56 62 6.0 32
Silver Mantos CGA-250 13 40 27.0 102 0.5 0.5
including 25 27 2.0 309 1.2 1.1
42 52 10.0 82 0.5 1.7
57 58 1.0 26
65 66.5 1.5 22
Silver Mantos CGA-251 10 12 2.0 39
16 18 2.0 29 0.6
20 37 17.0 125 0.8
40 47 7.0 34 0.6 0.6
Silver Mantos CGA-252 26 32 6.0 157 0.5 0.8
46 60.5 14.5 37 0.7
Silver Mantos CGA-253 No significant mineralization
Silver Mantos CGA-254 5 55 50.0 150 1.0 0.5
including 30 33 3.0 700 3.4 1.8
61 76 15.0 46
Silver Mantos CGA-255 7 9 2.0 0.6
9 21 12.0 65 1.2
27 47 20.0 245 0.5 0.5
including 42 44 2.0 853 0.6
49 53 4.0 35
55 57 2.0 42
60 73 13.0 210 0.7 0.8
including 65 67 2.0 895 2.2
73 74 1.0 1.1
75 82 7.0 48
82 84 2.0 0.7
84 88 4.0 22 0.6 2.4
88 91 3.0 1.2
91 108 17.0 22 0.5 1.3
108 116 8.0 0.8
Silver Mantos CGA-256 50 54 4.0 85
136 138 2.0 22 1.0
Silver Mantos CGA-257 17 31 14.0 240 1.3 1.1
32 34 2.0 43
35 40 5.0 69 0.6 1.2
43 70 27.0 73 0.5
Silver Mantos CGA-258 10 40 30.0 36
86 92 6.0 1.4
92 96 4.0 0.6 2.8
96 103 7.0 47 1.1 2.4
104 105 1.0 0.6 2.0
105 106 1.0 33 0.6 1.8
106 108 2.0 0.6 2.3
Mantos Basement CGA-258 110 171 61.0 151 2.0 1.3
including 115 116 1.0 675 4.4 3.4
and 157 160 3.0 403 3.7 1.2
and 166 168 2.0 640 8.6
173 174 1.0 51 0.5 0.5
174 176 2.0 0.5
177 197 20.0 110 1.2
199 207 8.0 97 1.5
Silver Mantos CGA-259 54 60 6.0 0.8
81 82 1.0 154 1.8 15.3
82 94 12.0 1.1
Mantos Basement CGA-259 101 129 28.0 144 1.8 0.7
including 125 127 2.0 740 2.9 2.4
131 136 5.0 37 0.6
139 141 2.0 36
142 143 1.0 102
145 183 38.0 186 1.1 0.5
including 146 151 5.0 347 0.8 0.6
and 163 165 2.0 420 5.5 0.7
184 185 1.0 31 1.1
188 189 1.0 69
191 192 1.0 33 0.5
194 196 2.0 25 0.8
202 206 4.0 37 0.7
215 216 1.0 36 0.7
Socavon del Diablo CGA-260W 2 6 4.0 0.8
20 30.5 10.5 4.3
Silver Mantos CGA-261 8 9 1.0 30
19 33 14.0 36
52 57 5.0 1.1
62 66 4.0 185 0.7
66 71 5.0 0.6
Mantos Basement CGA-261 83 102 19.0 73 1.6 0.5
103 115 12.0 207 4.4 0.5
including 108 111 3.0 566 10.6 0.8
118 132 14.0 86 0.6 0.5
146 149 3.0 57 0.5
150 153 3.0 44
158 159 1.0 190 1.9
162 171 9.0 85 1.4
Socavon del Diablo CGA-262W No samples

Notes to Table 1:

  1. The reported intervals are downhole lengths and are believed to approximate true width; this will be confirmed with geologic modeling.
  2. All grades are uncut.

Table 2. Drill hole location and orientation data

Hole Easting Northing Elevation (m) Azimuth (deg) Inclination (deg) Final depth (m)
CGA-248 3472669 7512320 4131 0 -90 66
CGA-249 3472733 7512311 4127 0 -90 62
CGA-250 3472786 7512287 4120 0 -90 68
CGA-251 3472638 7512313 4134 0 -90 65
CGA-252 3472690 7512264 4134 0 -90 62
CGA-253 3472755 7512583 4113 35 -50 100.5
CGA-254 3472708 7512342 4128 0 -90 80
CGA-255 3472727 7512372 4125 0 -90 131
CGA-256 3472736 7512564 4115 35 -50 145.5
CGA-257 3472718 7512279 4131 0 -90 110
CGA-258 3472611 7512374 4130 180 -50 220.5
CGA-259 3472585 7512438 4125 180 -50 224
CGA-260W 3473727 7512260 4068 0 -90 30.5
CGA-261 3472612 7512375 4130 270 -60 185
CGA-262W 3473727 7512253 4068 0 -90 10

Methodology and QA/QC

Analyses of the drill core were performed by Alex Stewart Assayers, in Mendoza, Argentina, an internationally recognized assay service provider. All samples were analyzed by method ICP-MA-39 that consists of a four acid digestion followed by ICP-OES detection. Silver results >200 Ag g/t were re-analyzed by fire assay with a gravimetric finish on 50-gram samples. Lead and zinc results >10,000 ppm were re-analyzed by a three acid digestion and ICP-OES detection. The Company follows industry standard procedures for the work carried out on the Chinchillas Project, with a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program. Blank, duplicate and standard samples were inserted into the drill core sample sequence sent to the laboratory for analysis. Golden Arrow detected no significant QA/QC issues during review of the data.

Qualified Persons

The results of the Company's drilling program have been reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by the Company's geological staff under the supervision of Brian McEwen, P.Geol., VP Exploration and Development to the Company. Mr. McEwen is a Qualified Person as defined in National Instrument 43-101, and has reviewed and approved the contents of the news release.

About Golden Arrow:

Golden Arrow Resources is a Vancouver-based exploration company focused on creating value by making precious and base metal discoveries and advancing them into exceptional deposits. The Company is currently focused on its Chinchillas Silver Project located in the mining-friendly Province of Jujuy, Argentina. Exploration has progressed rapidly since the acquisition of the project in late 2011. The innovative transaction announced October 1st, 2015, positions the Company to maximize shareholder value by fast-tracking Chinchillas to production and becoming a 25% owner of the world-class Pirquitas silver mine.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Mr. Joseph Grosso, Executive Chairman, President, CEO and Director

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply