galway's year end+ discussion on sedar
posted on
May 11, 2010 02:32PM
Edit this title from the Fast Facts Section
GALWAY RESOURCES LTD. (“Galway” or the “Company”) MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition of the Company should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. The information contained within this amended MD&A is current to April 29, 2010 and stated in US dollars, unless otherwise noted. The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. Additional information, including press releases, has been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at
www.sedar.com
.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
The Company is pleased with the progress made during 2009, notably securing a significant land package
in the California gold district in Colombia. Encouraging high-grade channel sample results were reported
on from these properties which are located adjacent to and along strike with Ventana’s La Mascota
discovery and 3 km from Greystar’s Angostura project. Drilling commenced late in 2009 and there are
currently 2 drills operating. Subsequent to the end of 2009, the Company secured a prospective land
position in the historic Vetas gold mining district located 8 kilometers from the California gold district.
Very encouraging high-grade results have since been released. Early in 2009, Galway secured a joint
venture agreement with Prodeco, the third largest coal producer in Colombia, for the Galca coal project
whereby they will manage and fund the initial drill program. Drilling commenced late in 2009 on this
potential new coal basin. During the year, the Company completed a CAD$12,000,000 private placement
with North American and European institutions. These funds will enable the Company to further advance
its Colombian gold initiative.
During the year, the Company incurred a net loss of $4,245,408 or $0.07 per share versus $6,761,153 or
$0.13 per share the prior year, as management curtailed expenses in response to difficult market
conditions.
The following Table 1 sets out a summary for each of the Company’s exploration areas showing the cost
incurred for the year ended December 31, 2009 and three months ended December 31, 2009. Comparable
figures are provided for the corresponding period in 2008.
Table 1
Breakdown by Exploration Area
(in US$)
Three Months Three Months Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Indian Springs, Nevada, USA
Assaying and sampling
$ - $ - $ -
$ 54,596
Environmental consulting
- - 21,554
15,961
General
- - 1,102
9,823
Geological and field expenses
- - -
79,779
Maps, reports and data
- - -
426
Mineral property fees
- 60,729 503
69,857
Travel
- - 299
3,335
Wages and salaries
- - -
31,365
Subtotal
$ - $ 60,729 $ 23,458
$ 265,142
Victorio Mountain, New Mexico, USA
Assaying and sampling
$ - $ 1,820 $ 354
$ 123,521
Drilling
- 905 10,285
1,056,288
Environmental consulting
- 7,251 -
19,434
General
- 4,317 -
77,980
Geological and field expenses
- 79,573 -
441,861
Maps, reports and data
- 151 67
1,853
Mineral property fees
- (69,588) 48,509
34,424
Travel - 8,890
-
99,552
Supplies - - - 114 Wages and salaries
- 53,042 36,874
320,999
Subtotal
$ - $ 86,361 $ 96,089
$ 2,176,026
Colombia Exploration
Assaying and sampling
$ 1,862 $ - $ 1,862
$ -
Drilling
- - 55,407
-
General
142,247 - 297,483
-
Geological and field expenses
1,992 - 47,198
-
Maps, reports and data
- - -
-
Mineral property fees
- - 5,225
-
Supplies
- -
- -
Travel
43,518 - 112,453
-
Wages and salaries
111,647 - 385,489
-
Subtotal
$ 301,266 $ - $ 905,117
$ -
Lone Mountain, New Mexico, USA
General
$ - $ - $ -
$ 1,359
Geological and field expenses
- - -
3,264
Travel
- - -
714
Subtotal
$ - $ - $ -
5,337
Three Months Three Months Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31, December,
2009 2008 2009 2008
General Exploration
Assaying and sampling
$ 43,680 $ 3,838 $ 65,623
$ 62,096
Drilling
92,466 2,233 90,385
105,622
Environmental Consulting - 16,994 - 16,994 General
12,039 108,763 11,143
324,351
Geological and field expenses
126,463 53,913 121,002
330,456
Maps, reports and data
23,327 (165) 27,792
12,884
Mineral property fees
316 (29,820) 316
-
Supplies - - - 5,908 Travel
117,682 84,010 206,306
276,341
Wages and salaries
28,970 258,364 196,498
926,686
Subtotal
$ 444,943 $ 498,130 $ 719,065
$ 2,061,338
Total exploration costs $ 746,209
$ 645,220 $1,743,729
$ 4,507,843
Table 1 shows a substantial reduction in overall expenses in response to depressed commodity prices and
difficult market conditions. Management continues to believe that Colombia offers the greatest
investment potential, while expenditure have been severely curtailed at the US based Victorio
molybdenum-tungsten project due to price weakness for the aforementioned metals.
Colombian Exploration
The exploration initiative in Colombia is focused on gold and coal, given the country’s vast geological
potential for these two commodities. The three primary projects are the California and Vetas gold projects
and the GALCA coal project. Total expenditures in Colombia during 2009 amounted to $905,117, with
virtually all expenses related to the Company’s gold initiative. Highlights of these initiatives include:
California (Colombia) Gold Initiative:
This new gold initiative was announced on July 28, 2009 and
provides the Company with a land position in the highly prospective California Gold District. The land package is comprised of 335 hectares along strike and adjacent to Ventana Gold’s La Bodega/Mascota property and 3 kilometers southwest of Greystar’s Angostura property. Efforts are currently underway to strategically add to Galway’s land position. Over 2,000 samples have been taken by Galway, of which some were reported on late in 2009. Some of the highlights of results that have been reported to date are:
•
El Dorado:
40.7 g/t Au and 752 g/t Ag in 135 square meters of silicified, brecciated, quartz
vein stockwork. 9.2 g/t Au from 68 chip samples over 130m of tunnel walls. This includes 20m of 27.3 g/t Au, including 6m of 63.3 g/t Au that includes 86.0 g/t Au over 2.0m.
•
Machuca:
3.9 g/t Au over 87m of tunnel walls, including 28m of 5.1 g/t Au, including 2m of
34.9 g/t Au.
•
Pie De Gallo:
16.6 g/t Au over 28m, including 24.4 g/t Au over 18m, including 118.3 g/t Au
over 2m and 3.8 g/t Au over 34m, including 35.6 g/t Au over 2m The first drilling campaign, which will comprise 4,500 meters, began late in the fourth quarter of 2009 and currently has 2 drills operating. The second phase drill program will be designed according to results from the first drill program. Current expectations are that the second phase drill program could consist of up to 25,000 meters and is expected to be completed in a nine month time period. This program will utilize three drilling machines. The expected cost for the first drilling program will be about $750,000 and phase 2 will be approximately $3,000,000.
Vetas Gold District
Subsequent to year end, the company secured an interest in the Reina de Oro and Coloro properties in the
center of the historic Vetas Gold Mining District located approximately 8km southeast of Galway’s
California properties. The properties are mostly contiguous and collectively comprise 542 hectares (1,339
acres). The Reina de Oro property's main asset at present, the El Volcan Mine, has been the site of gold
mining since the 1590's and has produced among the most gold of any in the historic California-Vetas
gold mining district. Some highlights of reported results include:
•
Manzanilla Vein:
104.8 g/t Au over a strike length of 70.1m and a true width of 0.9m,
including 223.8 g/t Au over a strike length of 25m, including 459.0 g/t Au over 11.5 m.
•
Loscas Vein:
317.6 g/t Au over a strike length of 25m and a true width of 0.8m. This is an
extension of, and includes the previously released 1,374.8 g/t Au over a strike length of 5m and a true width of 0.8m.
•
Tajo Abierto Conjugate Vein:
18.2 g/t Au over a strike length of 107m and a true width of
0.9 m.
•
Veta Ancha Vein:
37.9 g/t Au over a strike length of 37m and a true width of 1.5m.
•
Huesoduro Vein:
13.4 g/t Au over a strike length of 50m and a true width of 0.9m.
•
Loscas Vein:
12.4 g/t Au over a strike length of 19m and a true width of 0.9m.
GALCA Coal Project
: During the third quarter of 2009, the Company announced the initiation of a drill
program at the GALCA coal project in Colombia. The Company has an exploration and joint venture agreement with Prodeco which is the third largest coal producer in Colombia, with 11 million tons of annual coal production. The GALCA coal project comprises 132,000 hectares that Galway believes could host a new undiscovered coal basin that occurs close to surface. This 19 hole drilling program will be focused on two areas (the northern flank and the southeastern portion) that appear to have the highest prospect of coal near the surface, and is expected to be completed by the end of the first half of 2010. This drilling program will be entirely managed and funded by Prodeco. The terms of the GALCA exploration and joint venture agreement include the following: Prodeco will fund the first 19 drill holes, and in consideration for agreeing to fund the feasibility drilling program, will be granted a 60% equity interest in the project. Prodeco will then earn the remaining 40% equity interest in the project by paying Galway an already agreed value per tonne of economically mineable open-cut reserves determined in accordance with the JORC Code, up to US$70 million.
Victorio (Molybdenum-Tungsten) Property
The Victorio Project is an underground molybdenum-tungsten property located in south-western New
Mexico. A positive Scoping Study was released on this project during 2008. An NI 43-101 Resource
Estimate has also been provided on this project, incorporating 215,000 feet of drilling. During 2009,
$96,089 was spent on advancing the Victorio project. Management has curtailed spending on this project
due to low molybdenum and tungsten prices. John Tumazos of Very Independent Opinion, has been
engaged to help commercialize this project.
Table 2 and Table 3 show the details of the General and Administrative expenses and Professional Fees
of the Company.
Table 2
General and Administrative expenses
(in US$)
Three Months Three Months Year Year
Ended Ended Ended Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
General and Administration
Salaries
$35,160 $52,695 $95,861
$365,248
Insurance
$21,720 $22,814 $68,523
$103,465
Rent
$27,460 $21,415 $29,675
$68,025
Telephone & Server
$16,551 $10,170 $56,656
$34,670
Other
$121,333 $(52,919) $253,183
$455,982
Total
$222,224 $54,175 $503,898
$1,027,390
Table 3
Professional Fees
(in US$)
Three Months Three Months Year Year
Ended Ended Ended Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
General and Administration
Accounting Fees
$11,098 $19,907 $49,506
$67,055
Audit Fees
$13,308 $11,195 $51,551
$115,692
Legal Fees
$138,756 $19,733 $196,652
$125,354
Other Professional Fees
$18,340 $1,845 $62,821
$226,803
Corporate Secretarial Fees
$3,267 $0 $8,571
$0
Total
$184,769 $52,680 $369,101
$534,904
Tables 2 and 3 show a substantial reduction of expenditures in the United States as a result of actions
undertaken by management to adapt to difficult market conditions around the world. Staff reductions and
office closings took place in the United States as the Victorio molybdenum-tungsten project has been put
on hold as pricing for the aforementioned metals remains depressed.
SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
Year Ended
December 31,
2008
Year Ended
December 31,
2007
Year Ended
December 31,
2006
$ $ $
Interest and other income 11,358 191,897 315,295 10,819
Loss for the period (4,245,408) (6,761,153) (9,679,250) (3,691,197)
General and administration
expenses 503,898 1,027,390 1,554,391 784,286
Exploration expenses 1,743,729 4,507,843 5,654,470 2,283,213
Net loss per share, basic and
fully diluted (0.07) (0.13) (0.23) (0.23)
Total assets 13,845,275 5,120,387 11,876,474 5,094,482
Shareholders’equity (deficiency) 12,202,650 4,698,702 11,512,363 4,614,913
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31, 2009
Galway incurred a net loss of $4,245,408 for the year ended December 31, 2009, resulting in a loss per
share of $0.07. The loss was mostly attributable to exploration costs which amounted to $1,743,729, in
addition to general and administrative fees of $503,898, professional fees of $369,101 and $1,380,807 in
stock-based compensation fees, included in this figure is a non-cash write-off of $717,568 to recognize
dropping the Indian Springs property. The Company also earned $11,358 in interest income during the
period. Galway incurred expenses of $4,766,783 during the period compared with $7,057,173 for 2008.
The decrease is principally attributable to expense reduction to align the Company with the economic
realities of the industry. Galway incurred exploration expenditures of $1,743,729 in connection with its
portfolio of properties, compared with $4,507,843 for 2008. The decrease in expenditures is again related
to the decrease in activity to conserve cash in this difficult period.
General and administrative expenses of $503,898 were incurred in the period, compared with $1,027,390
for the same period in the prior year. The reduction is due to the adjustment of the structure of the
company to reflect the economic reality.
Year ended December 31, 2008
Galway incurred a net loss of $6,761,153 for the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting in a loss per
share of $0.13. The loss was primarily attributable to expenses of $7,057,173 which consisted of,
$4,507,843 in exploration costs, $1,027,390 in general and administrative, $33,270 in listing and filing
fees, $534,904 in professional fees, $714,364 in stock-based compensation, $41,280 in amortization,
$74,365 in asset impairment and $123,757 in travel expenses. The Company’s loss decreased by
$2,918,097 compared to the previous year due to less aggressive spending as the Company advances its
projects. During the year the Company expended a total of $4,507,843 on exploration projects which
focused primarily on the Victorio project, in addition to expenditures related to exploration in Colombia.
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following table sets out selected unaudited quarterly financial information of the Company:
Dec 31,
2009
Sept 30,
2009
June 30,
2009
March 31,
2009
$ $ $ $
Interest and other Income 3,344 788 1,114 6,112
Net loss for the period (1,848,514) (610,730) (366,284) (1,419,880)
Net loss per share (0.03) (0.01) (0.01) (0.03)
Total assets 13,845,275 13,527,451 3,435,085 3,706,900
Dec 31,
2008
Sept 30,
2008
June 30,
2008
March 31,
2008
$ $ $ $
Interest and other Income 13,194 36,443 53,116 89,144
Net loss for the period (735,050) (1,214,955) (2,046,030) (2,765,118)
Net loss per share (0.01) (0.02) (0.04) (0.05)
Total assets 5,120,387 6,664,432 8,024,494 9,677,539
The fundamental change driving the financial results of the Company is the shift of emphasis from
operating and exploring in the United States to operating and exploring in Colombia. As previously stated,
all expenditures in the United States have been curtailed or reduced to a minimum. Management will
begin to increase expenditures following the recovery of molybdenum and tungsten pricing.
The overall loss in the third quarter of 2009 versus the prior quarter is a result of increased expenditures
associated with the California gold projects. However, the loss compared with the same period from the
prior year was significantly less due to lower overall exploration activity. The increase in net assets in the
third quarter 2009 is due to the cash infusion into the Company from the private placement completed by
the Company for gross proceeds of CAD$12,000,000.
ANALYSIS OF FOURTH QUARTER 2009
Galway incurred a net loss of $1,848,514 for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, resulting in a loss per
share of $0.03. The loss was primarily attributable to expenses of $2,464,537 which consisted of,
$746,209 in exploration costs, $222,224 in general and administrative, $13,300 for accounts receivables
write-off, $360 in listing and filing fees, $184,769 in professional fees, $1,298,008 in stock-based
compensation and $4,744 in amortization. The Company also earned $3,344 in interest income.
CURRENT CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Total cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, were respectively, $11,574,667 and
$3,581,906 with working capital of $11,002,848 and $3,292,031 respectively. Total share capital as at
December 31, 2009 was $26,190,909. Management is focus on conserving resources in this period of
difficult markets.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
On February 9, 2010 a reform of the Colombian Mining Code, Law 1382, went into effect which requires
that mining and exploration activity be excluded from the Paramo ecosystem. Paramo is an ecosystem
above 3,200 meters elevation consisting of glacier-formed valleys and plains with lakes, peat bogs, and
wet and dry grasslands intermingled with shrub lands and forest patches. It is the Company’s opinion that
reform of the existing Mining Code, Law 1382, does not affect its California properties located adjacent
to and along strike Ventana’s La Mascota property. Galway’s California concessions are below the 3,200
meter elevation in which the Paramo ecosystem exist and the Company’s exploration efforts are taking
place in areas no higher than 2,500 meters above sea level. Galway is operating its three projects in
Colombia under approved environmental management plans. The El Volcan mine, which is above 3,200
meters of elevation, is currently operating and producing gold under an exploitation license that is valid
for 26 years, and as such we do not believe it will be impacted by reform of the mining code. The
GALCA coal project has altitudes ranging from 400 to 700 meters and thus will not be affected by the
mining code reform.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The details of the Company’s accounting policies are presented in Note 2 of the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006. The following policies are considered by management
to be essential to understanding the processes and reasoning that go into the preparation of the
Company’s financial statements and the uncertainties that could have a bearing on its financial results:
Changes in accounting policies
Exploration expenditures and acquisition payments
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the following accounting policy with respect to
exploration expenditures and acquisition payments:
All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Significant property acquisition payments for
active exploration properties are capitalized. If no economically feasible ore body is discovered,
previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period that the property is abandoned. Capitalized costs
will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve.
Valuation of warrants
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the following accounting policy with respect to the
valuation of warrants issued as part of a private placement unit:
The proceeds from the issue of units is allocated between common shares and common share purchase
warrants on a pro-rata basis based on relative fair values as follows:
•
the fair value of common shares is based on the market close on the date the units are issued; and
•
the fair value of the common share purchase warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes
pricing model.
Change in reporting currency
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed its reporting currency from the Canadian Dollar to the
US Dollar. The reason for the change was due to the change in the functional currency of the Company
due to the volume of transactions denominated in US Dollars.
Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, have been translated into the reporting
currency using the current rate method. Under this method, the statement of operations and the cash flow
statement items for each year end period have been translated into the reporting currency using the rates
in effect at the date of the transactions, and assets and liabilities have been translated using the exchange
rate at the end of the year or period. All resulting exchange differences are reported as a separate
component of shareholders’ equity entitled cumulative translation adjustment. The impact of this change
for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $10,891.
Resource Property Costs
All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Significant property acquisition payments for
active exploration properties are capitalized. If no economically feasible ore body is discovered,
previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period that the property is abandoned. Capitalized costs
will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve.
The recoverability of the amounts capitalized for the undeveloped resource properties is dependent upon
the determination of economically recoverable ore reserves, confirmation of the Company’s interest in
the underlying mineral claims, the ability to farm out its resource properties, the ability to obtain the
necessary financing to complete their development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the
disposition thereof.
The Company assesses its capitalized resource property costs on a regular basis. A property is writtendown
or written-off when the Company determines that no further work is warranted. The Company will
also reduce its capitalized resource property costs if no active exploration has been conducted on the
property for a period of three or more years.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company applies the fair value method of accounting for stock options. The fair value of the options
will be determined using an option pricing model that takes into account, as of the grant date, the exercise
price, the expected life of the option, the current price of the underlying stock and its expected volatility,
expected dividends on the stock, and the risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. Cash
consideration received from employees on exercise of options is credited to capital stock along with the
original grant date fair value of the options exercised. The Company expenses the fair value of stock
options granted over the vesting period with the corresponding credit to contributed surplus.
Management’s Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted CICA Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”
which replaces CICA Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and
Development Costs”, as well as EIC-27, "Revenues and Expenditures During the Pre-operating Period",
and part of Accounting Guideline 11, "Enterprises in the development stage". Under previous Canadian
standards, a greater number of items were recognized as assets than are recognized under CICA 3064 and
3450. The provisions relating to the definition and initial recognition of intangible assets under these new
standards reduce the differences with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") in the
accounting for intangible assets. The objectives of CICA 3064 are: 1) to reinforce the principle-based
approach to the recognition of assets; 2) to establish the criteria for asset recognition; and 3) to clarify the
application of the concept of matching revenues and expenses such that the current practice of
recognizing items that do not meet the recognition criteria is eliminated. The standard also provides
guidance for the recognition of internally developed intangible assets (including research and
development activities), ensuring consistent treatment of all intangible assets. The portions in the standard
relating to goodwill remain unchanged. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company's
presentation of its financial position or results of operations as at December 31, 2009.
Mining Exploration Costs
On March 27, 2009, the Emerging Issues Committee of the CICA approved an abstract EIC7-174 Mining
Exploration Costs, which provides guidance on capitalization of exploration costs related to mining
properties in particular, and on impairment of long-lived assets in general. The adoption of this standard
had no impact on the Company's presentation of its financial position or results of operations as at
December 31, 2009.
Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2009, the CICA approved EIC 173 Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This guidance clarified that an entity's own credit risk and the credit risk of the
counterparty should be taken into account in determining the fair value of financial assets and financial
liabilities including derivative instruments. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company's
presentation of its financial position or results of operations as at December 31, 2009.
New Accounting Changes Adopted
Fair Value Hierarchy and Liquidity Risk Disclosure
In June 2009, the CICA issued an amendment to Handbook Section 3862 to provide improvements to fair
value and liquidity risk disclosures. The amendment applies to the Company's fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009. This adoption resulted in additional disclosure presented on Note 2 to the financial
statements.
Future Accounting Changes
Business Combinations. Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests
The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, Business Combinations,
Section 1601, Consolidated Financial Statements and Section 1602, Non-Controlling interests. These new
standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is in the
process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.
Sections 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business
combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. The section applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Sections 1601 and 1602 together
replace section 1600, Consolidated Financial Statements. Section 1601, establishes standards for the
preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1601 applies to interim and annual consolidated
financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1602
establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial
statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS
International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and
applies to interim and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2011.
International financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
The AcSB has confirmed that IFRS will replace current Canadian GAAP for publicly accountable
enterprises, effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Accordingly, the Company
will report interim and annual financial statements (with comparatives) in accordance with IFRS
beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2011.
The Company has commenced the development of an IFRS implementation plan to prepare for this
transition, and is in the process of analyzing the key areas where changes to current accounting policies
may be required. While an analysis will be required for all accounting policies, the initial key areas of
assessment will include:
•
Exploration and development expenditures;
•
Stock-based compensation;
•
Accounting for income taxes; and
•
First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 1).
As the analysis of each of the key areas progresses, other elements of the Company’s IFRS implementation plan will also be addressed, including: the implication of changes to accounting policies and processes; financial statement note disclosures on information technology; internal controls; contractual arrangements; and employee training. The table below summarizes the expected timing of activities related to the Company’s transition to IRFS. Initial analysis of key areas for which changes to accounting policies may be required Complete Detailed analysis of all relevant IFRS requirements and identification of areas requiring accounting policy changes or those with accounting policy alternatives Complete Assessment of first-time adoption (IFRS 1) requirements and alternatives Complete Final determination of changes to accounting policies and choices to be made with respect to first-time adoption alternatives In Progress, completion expected during Q-2 2010 Resolution of the accounting policy change implications on information technology, internal controls and contractual arrangements In progress, completion expected during Q-2 2010 Management and employee education and training Throughout the transition process Quantification of the Financial statement impact of changes in accounting policies Throughout fiscal 2011
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
During the year, $7,759 (2008 - $68,325) was paid to a company with a director and officer in common
for administrative services. Included in due to related parties is $132 (2008 - $8,752) owing to this
company.
The above transactions, occurring in the normal course of operations, are measured at the exchange
amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares of which 77,152,867
common shares are issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2009. As of the date of the MD&A, being
April 29, 2010 there were 77,960,367 common shares outstanding.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had 7,092,500 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging
from C$0.10 to C$1.12 and expiry dates ranging from October 19, 2010 to October 9, 2014. The
Company had 12,000,000 warrants outstanding at an exercise price of $0.72 and expiring on September
29, 2011. The Company also had 1,680,000 compensation options outstanding at an exercise price of
$0.50 and expiring on September 29, 2011. If exercised, each compensation option comprises one unit
consisting of one common share and one-half of one warrant with each whole warrant being issued at an
exercise price of $0.75 and expiring on September 29, 2011.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, and amounts due to related parties. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the
Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from the financial
instruments. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value due to their
short-term maturity or capacity of prompt liquidation.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management has evaluated the design of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during
the period covered by this Management Discussion and Analysis, and has determined that the internal
controls over financial reporting provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures during the period covered by this Management Discussion and Analysis and has
concluded that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the
Company is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with appropriate timescales.
APPROVAL
The Board of Directors of the Company has approved the disclosure contained in this MD&A. A copy of
this MD&A will be provided to anyone who requests it