I am posting this question on this forum since I categorically refuse to ever post anything ever again on the CUU Hub. I view at least some of the CUU HLs as still being totally out of control with their anonymous and quick removal of messages that are either critical of the company or of the HLs actions themselves. The last thing Agoracom needs is a possee of censors deleting messages simply becacuse they fail to meet the acid test of unrestrained optimism that continues to be the theme on this hub. This despite the fact that the sp of this stock has been in more or less free fall for an extended period of time. Surely the purpose of an Agoracom Hub is to promote lively discussion rather than to simply act as cheerleaders for the company being discussed. There should be a place for raising serious questions about the stock and its management as well. I note that at least some of the CUU HLs post on this Hub as well. I would respectively ask them to explain if possible the incredibly high number of messages being flagged and/or removed from the Hub they lead as well as the banning of several members. I agree with the critics on the CUU Hub that reasons should be given to the Hub members as to why their messages are being removed. It would also help if the leaders doing the removals would cease hiding behind their cloaks of invisibility. PLease forgive this rant but the CUU mess has been getting on my nerves for a rather long time now and I do not see the situation as markedly improving. I own a large position in the stock and would dearly love to see a forum initiated where I would feel comfortable asking hard questions and talking the serious talk so badly supressed due to HL activity.

Doc