How can you argue that Chm dropped in value from 3.00 to 1.14 to justify what FNC management has been doing and take the heat or blame off peter.

Rago! - the way i see it - CHM started 3 years ago from NOTHING - took FNC property and turned it into 95M market cap today. (so it was 250M plus before the crash - so?)

Fnc - is trading at 17M (less after today) which is not even worth the % interest in that chm property. Add insult to injury - NO recognition for any other properties - which we know are each worth 3x present value.

NO buzz created about FNC - why is that Rago?

And trust me - peter could never do 1/10 the job Larsen and crew have done with Fermont... peter would have started with one drill and gone at zero miles an hour.

so the argument still stands - FNC management- has done - is doing and predicatbly will do nothing good for promoting the stock and GET recognition for us the shareholders.

Credible and serious changes to management need to be implemented.

IMHO