And yet, despite the market, had FNC reported what CHM just reported our Sp would have increased. We're attempting to produce to catch up to a vicinity play with a CHM buyout offer. CHM's news didn't make chm sp go up because the NR neglected to put the button on their latest ore report. What is the overall estimated tonnage. They are moving rapidly, and it is likely the current SP has already integrated the anticipated ore, so perhaps a button is not relevant until the next NPV. Conclusion: iron is as relevant as a CEO's ability to sell it. The volatility of an iron play both exceeds ore tonnage's worth as rapidly as is underestimates or ignores it -making momentum of a CEO's move the only relevance once ore is revealed. In this light, one could debate the equation of the quality of the CEO to the quality of ore. In this calculation one might evaluate CHM's Fermont ore with Larsen, somehow equating to $1.50. .75 for ore and .75 for Larsen's ability to attract investors and general interest? For FNC, we haven't proven the ore sufficiently for Magpie, and nothing yet for Lac Lamalee. Does this place a .35c evaluation for Smith? Have I been comparing too many baseball stats during family vacation? I'm grateful for the updates, but we haven't gotten the NR goods yet. It's still forthcoming. Although my time estimation is shot, I'm still anticipating all rhe FNC teams edfort to cuimate to a winter of FNC multiples. -sg