Hi there SG,

A few comments to you post:

this is a public company, not Peter's baby! Why wouldn't we want a Friedland on the board - did you not see what happened to Diamond Fields!! Imagine what a little promotion might do for Fancamp?? I'm not about to standby and watch a company's shareprice stay suppressed and not reflect its true value because a CEO has proven he's incapable of taking it to the next level. And as conservative Peter has been, you're forgetting a very important point that Peter never considered a simple financing in the 2-3 dollar range a few years ago. That completely confounds any decision he's ever made about nickel and diming this company and then when he had the opportunity to raise serious money at minimal dilution, he treated this company as a casino parlor and let his ego make his decisions. For that, i believe he should be held accountable. And he's been given ample opportunites to show us he is capable of establishing a future development plan of growing this company in a systematic way. That has not been done. And enough of the property acquisitions!!!! We don't need any more my God!

Okay, there's my rant. There were just too many points and way too much emotional sentimentality that should not be in the sphere of a public company. I like to think we have given Peter a tremendous amount of time to prove the naysayers wrong. He hasn't IMO.

GLA - hope to see you at the AGM!