I do not have access to topo maps so can`t say how much of an advantage this would be but quess not much. The last NR for McFaulds notes that Hole FN-10-19 was drilled at 85 degrees and to the northeast. This hole hit granodiorite at 675 m. Down hole geophysics was run to 669 m where a blockage was present and the conductance was increasing towards the bottom. Both Harvey and Peter seem quite interested in this and appear to want to run the down hole geophysics to the bottom of the hole.

From this I suspect a hole at 85 degrees to the southwest might hit the conductive zone, whatever it might be. So from the comfort of my armchair, Peter`s proposed action might be `clean Hole FN-10-19 and re-run the geophysics to the bottom of the hole to try to get more info on the conductive zone followed by setting the drill hole dip and azimuth to hit the target`. As the target is expected to be 600 m from surface a dip in the topo is probably a distraction as the hole dip and azimuth are dicticated by the target. Wild speculation on a Sunday evening, but what do I know.

meadow hen