My eye is on the toe of the fancamp 'boot', about which this is what Kaiser had to say back in October 2007. I still see this anomoly on both surveys.

From Kaiser:

An obvious question is why, if this EM conductor is so exciting, Noront had not drilled it a couple years ago when speculators were still optimistic that McFauld's Lake hosted major VMS deposits. The answer lies with the total magnetic field map above on which I have super-imposed in yellow the EM conductor. Note how it wraps along the flank of the magnetic high anomaly. The rocks represented by the magnetic high feature would have been interpreted as mafic or ultramafic rocks that are not associated with volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits, which are formed through seabed volcanoes with a felsic composition. Because nobody was considering the possibility of mafic rock hosted magmatic sulphide deposits, the conductor would have been dismissed as graphite within the mafic rocks. Noront was willing to drill the target on the Greenstone/Condor claim because it seemed to be a separate conductor whose association with a magnetic high might have been just the result of distortions that crop up at the edges of geophysical data sets. Of course Noront and everybody else is now hoping that it is all one big conductor representing 2,400 metres of nickel-copper-PGM bearing magmatic sulphides and that the initial discovery is similar to the Discovery Hill zone at Voisey's Bay! Noront is now conducting detailed ground geophysical surveys over this conductor prior to drilling.

http://www.kaiserbottomfish.com/s/Ex... ...