>Did some digging and evaluating on my own, trying to pick up the lost path and what did I find ?

Boy, you are good….at misrepresentation. First of all you didn’t provide the link, but don’t worry I’ll do it for you.

http://www.jardhitafelag.is/media/PDF/S12Paper057.pdf

>This upper Pannonian aquifer has an area of 40,000km2, an average thickness of 200-300 m,

Here’s what you left out..

A typical geothermal well in Hungary might have a depth between 1,000 and 2,100 m.

I don’t mind to remind you that the Falcon-Exxon-MOL venture, better known as the Makó trough BCGA, lies beneath 2800 meters.

> a bulk porosity of 20-30%, and a permeability of 500-1,500 mD. The hot water reservoir has an almost uniform hydrostatic pressure distribution; local recharge or discharge can slightly modify this pattern.....................

Wow, permeability of 500-1,500 mD (milliDarcy), this is a huge number. Compare this to the BCGA’s permeability of .1 mD, I really don’t know how’re you going to squeeze Lake Michigan into this formation.

Anyway, let Ben Law show his presentation.

http://www.searchanddiscovery.net/documents/2009/110104law/ndx_law.pdf