Thanks Glorieux. I listened to the conference live and even asked a question (my question was related to the current operating efficiency of the low profile equipment as it relates to their current production projections for 2011). I agree with your comments regarding the candid discussion of delays and missed projections by management and can't help thinking back to the comments made by Peter Ball at the Cambridge Conference when he said that in the next six months CMM would be a very different company. I was particularly impressed by the questions from one of the callers (Don .. I think his name was) related to mine development strategies etc. He was able to learn that the company currently has 16 faces that they are working whereas Peggy initially predicted that roughly 25 faces were needed to give those projected numbers. What I couldn't figure out is whether a number of new faces will need to be identified/opened to reach their targets or whether those numbers were based on the expected tonnage from the 16 currently available faces. The company has indicated it will be forthright with answers to questions raised to Peter Ball so I will see if I can find out more with a phone call or two.

Best,

Scott